Grant law
Preparation of the award procedure
For grant recipients, the preparation of the award begins with the grant application — not just with the first tender text. Errors in this phase come to light at the latest during the review by the granting authority.
Practical note
As early as possible
The preparation of the award does not end with the grant application
Audit risk
Subsequent inspection
Award errors are checked by the funding provider in the proof of use
What we do for you
Type of procedure & determination of contract value
We clarify which type of award procedure is prescribed by your funding decision and correctly determine the contract value for all lots.
Rerailing &
Lot formation
Award documents & contract design
Why the preparation of the award procedure is so important
Procurement procedures are precondition-rich not only in factual but also in legal terms. Anyone who makes a mistake here is jeopardizing their project and their funding. Mistakes in contract design catch up with the grantee in the execution phase. Improperly drafted award documents already cause problems during the award procedure, but at the latest during the review by the funding agency or the granting authority. The application for a grant merely marks the beginning of the preparation of the procedure, but does not mark the end of it.
Choosing the right type of award procedure
Before initiating a procurement procedure, it is always necessary to clarify which procurement procedure type is relevant. This usually depends on the type of service and the contract value — but the ancillary provisions of the grant award notice and the practice of the respective funding body are also decisive. An exception may also apply, according to which you may carry out a less competitive, faster award procedure or even award the contract directly. In order to clarify these questions with legal certainty, knowledge of the relevant provisions of procurement law and case law is required, as well as the practice of the grantor. That is why it is advisable to consult a specialist lawyer for public procurement law. We are happy to be there for you.
The rerail of your procurement
When thinking about the right type of award procedure, it often becomes apparent that different trades are to be procured. Bei den Überlegungen zur richtigen Art des Vergabeverfahrens zeigt sich oft, dass unterschiedliche Gewerke zu beschaffen sind. And so what at first glance appears to be a simple purchasing procedure turns into a cascade of successive and parallel award procedures, with which the most diverse service providers are approached. The best way to ensure that your award procedures are compatible with one another is to consult a specialist lawyer. Feel free to consult us at any time.
Overall award — yes or no?
Sometimes procurement experience advises precisely not to divide by lots, but to make an overall award. We are thinking of general planners, total contractors and total contractors, general contractors and general contractors. What sounds good, however, is often enough contrary to procurement law and thus puts your funding at risk in a special way. You should have an experienced law firm for public procurement law check whether an overall award can be made by way of exception.
The cross-lot order value determination
When you set up your procurement and form specialty or area lots, how do you actually determine the contract value? Lot-sharp or lot-spanning? Since a correct and up-to-date contract value determination is mandatory to initiate a procurement procedure, you must also deal with it. The best thing to do is to let us help you with this.
Self-declarations, contract performance conditions, award criteria — and what else?
Preparation of the contract award includes, among other things, the preparation of relevant self-declarations, the definition of verifiable contract performance conditions, the determination of legally compliant suitability and award criteria and, of course, the legal review of the performance specification, which is the heart of every contract award. Don’t leave anything to chance here, but ask for specialist legal advice.
Ineffective clauses lead to considerable legal uncertainty and obligations with serious consequences. As a grant recipient, you therefore benefit from modern and at the same time tailor-made contracts that harmonize the current legal requirements with individual needs. Even if you are obliged to use model contracts (e.g. EVB-IT), it depends on how they are drafted in detail. Our experts will be happy to help you with the drafting of the contract and will also take into account legal requirements relating to grants, such as the ban on the premature start of measures.
Typical procedure
- Determination of contract value and threshold value check
- Clarification of the relevant type of award procedure
- Checking rerailing and lot formation obligations
- Preparation of the tender documents
- Drafting of contracts in consideration of funding law requirements
Frequently asked questions about procedural support
General initial orientation — no substitute for legal advice in individual cases.
When do I have to carry out an award procedure as a funding recipient?
This depends on the ancillary provisions of your grant award notice. Many funding providers stipulate the application of public procurement regulations above certain contract values — regardless of whether you are a contracting authority within the meaning of the GWB. The specific thresholds and types of procedure that apply to your project can only be assessed on a case-by-case basis. We will be happy to help you with this.
What does the ban on the premature commencement of measures mean for the preparation of the contract award?
The prohibition generally prohibits the start of implementation of the funded project — including legally binding contract awards — before the grant has been awarded. Preparatory steps such as planning, calculation and preparation of the award documents are generally not covered by this. You should seek legal advice in advance to clarify what applies in your specific case. We will be happy to help you with this.
What are the consequences of an incorrect award preparation for my funding?
Errors in the award preparation — such as the selection of the wrong type of procedure, an incorrect determination of the contract value or inadequate award documents — can be objected to as part of the verification of the use of funds. Depending on the severity of the error, there is a risk of pro rata reductions or complete revocation of funding. We will be happy to discuss with you how you can protect yourself.
Note: No legal advice. All answers do not replace an individual examination by a lawyer.
Immediate initial consultation
for new clients
- Problem solving in contracting is a race against time!
Our locations
- LeipzigLessingstraße 2, 04109 Leipzig
- Ganghoferstr. 68a, 80339 MunichLearn more
- MagdeburgHegelstrasse 39, 39104 Magdeburg
- FrankfurtKaiserhofstr. 16, 60313 Frankfurt am Main
- BerlinPariser Platz 6 A, 10117 Berlin